Most states in the United States uphold fault-based systems for handling car accidents, and Arizona also follows the traditional fault-based system. This means that all drivers must purchase and maintain auto liability insurance for use in the event of an accident. In a fault-based state, the driver who causes an accident is liable for the resulting damages.
Some car accidents are more straightforward than others when it comes to determining fault. For example, if one driver was driving legally within the speed limit and another driver under the influence of alcohol in Glendale, AZ, causes an accident with the first driver, liability for the incident will almost certainly fall to the intoxicated driver. However, the fault is more difficult to determine in some car accident cases. Depending on the location of the accident, the traveling direction, and speeds of the drivers involved, and the traffic pattern in the area, it is possible for liability to fall to one or multiple drivers, including those injured in the accident.
An injured driver must establish liability for an accident in a fault-based state before filing an insurance claim or pursuing legal action against another party. The first steps after any car accident are important for all drivers and can have a profound effect on an injured driver’s recovery options.
Determining fault is an essential step for handling a car accident in any state like Arizona that follows a traditional fault-based system. In a no-fault state, every driver uses his or her own insurance to cover damages from accidents regardless of who caused those accidents, except under specific conditions like cases involving very severe injuries or damages beyond the scope of available insurance coverage.
Arizona also follows a comparative negligence law, meaning that more than one party, including an injured driver, could potentially absorb fault for a claimed incident. For example, if one driver was texting behind the wheel and ran a red light, striking another driver who was speeding, the distracted driver who committed the moving violation would likely absorb most of the fault for the accident. Additionally, the speeding driver would likely incur some fault despite the fact that he or she was driving with the right-of-way, due to speeding.
The comparative fault could come into play with an insurance claim or a civil lawsuit for a car accident in Arizona. The plaintiff’s shared fault for a car accident would diminish the potential recovery he or she could secure. The shared fault may also bar a driver from securing an insurance settlement. Ultimately, any driver concerned about the fault in a recent Arizona car crash should contact an attorney as soon as possible.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Attorney John Phebus, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a personal injury attorney.
Accidents causing serious injuries don't just generate medical bills. Physical pain, emotional trauma, and losing the ability to enjoy daily activities all deserve compensation that goes well beyond ...
Posted by John Phebus
A crash on an Arizona roadway immediately creates confusion and financial strain. While you sort out repairs and recovery, strict filing deadlines move forward with no warning. Understanding how ...
read morePosted by John Phebus
Accidents resulting in physical harm can leave victims facing enormous medical bills, lost income, and a prolonged recovery. Because injuries may lead to the need for near-term and long-term supp...
read moreIf you or a loved one has been seriously injured, please fill out the form below for your free consultation or call us at (623) 267-9283