When you hear DUI, you likely think of drinking and driving, but “under the influence” has more than one meaning. Arizona has rejected the passage of Prop 205, the law that would have allowed recreational marijuana, but it doesn’t remove the instances of drugged driving and allegations of this behavior.
Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-1381 defines driving or controlling a motor vehicle while under the influence. It includes alcohol, drugs, and even vapor releasing substances. The key component in A.R.S. § 28-1381 (A)(1) is whether or not the motorist is impaired by the substance in question. This means that you can be charged with DUI even if the substance that caused your impairment is legal medication prescribed to you. Naturally, illegal drugs and medication for which you have no prescription lead to additional charges and likely harsher penalties
It’s important to understand that actual impairment isn’t the only criteria necessary to be charged with drugged DUI. In A.R.S. § 28-1381 (A)(3), the law states that just having evidence of specific drugs and/or metabolites in your body is grounds for a conviction. This is referred to as a per se violation. The drugs specified can be found under A.R.S. §13-3401, which include the following:
The first thing a police officer typically does when he suspects that you are impaired due to drugs or medication is to perform a field sobriety test. If he believes your “results” indicate that you have taken drugs, he can then request a urine or blood test. As with all suspected DUI offenses, you are legally required to comply in accordance with implied consent.
But how does a law enforcement officer make the initial call for a drugged DUI? This can be a very gray area. LEO undergoes various impairment recognition programs that are meant to train them to “spot” behavior that indicates impairment or suspected drug use, but the validity of these evaluations is often challenged, and rightly so. The science is suspect, and the results vary too greatly to be dependable on a consistent basis.
A skilled Phoenix DUI defense attorney will review all aspects of the traffic stop and subsequent arrest. He can challenge the admissibility of the evidence provided, and assert any available affirmative defenses against this type of DUI. The law in this area is complex, so it’s a good idea to seek the help of a Glendale DUI drugs lawyer with knowledge on these types of charges.
Sources: http://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/01381.htm, http://www.crimeandinjurylaw.com/DUI/Drug-Related-DUI
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Attorney John Phebus, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a personal injury attorney.
Facing a DUI conviction in Scottsdale can feel complex since one of the most frequent questions that arises during the process is how long a DUI stays on your record. Whether you’re concerned about...
Posted by John Phebus
In Arizona, the line between a DUI being considered a misdemeanor or a felony offense is not always clear-cut. While most DUI cases in Arizona are charged as misdemeanors, there are certain circu...
read morePosted by John Phebus
There were approximately a quarter of a million crimes committed in the state of Arizona last year. The vast majority of those were less serious misdemeanors. As for the more serious felonies tho...
read moreIf you or a loved one has been seriously injured, please fill out the form below for your free consultation or call us at (623) 267-9283